Torvosaurus sp. (Dinosauria : Theropoda) in the Late Jurassic of Portugal

Citation:
Mateus, O., & Antunes M. T. (2000).  Torvosaurus sp. (Dinosauria : Theropoda) in the Late Jurassic of Portugal. Livro de Resumos do I Congresso Ibérico de Paleontologia, pp: 115-117. 115-117.

Abstract:

n/a

Related External Link

TORVOSAURUS SP. (DINOSAURIA: THEROPODA) IN THE LATE JURASSIC OF PORTUGAL

INTRODUCTION
Only three taxa of large theropods (Carnosauria sensu lato) are known in the Late Jurassic of Portugal: Lourinhanosaurus antunesi (Allosauroidea; Mateus, 1998), Allosaurus fragilis (Allosauridae; Pérez-Moreno et al., 1999), Ceratosaurus sp. and the embryos briefly described by Mateus et al. (1997) show affinities with Lourinhanosaurus.
The ascription of the Portuguese theropod of “Andrés” to Allosaurus fragilis should be
carefully regarded because its anatomy does not exclude the possibility to corresponds to
Lourinhanosaurus.
In 1998 was discovered a theropod tibia (ML430) that is here described. It was found at
Casal do Bicho on the border of Caldas da Rainha and Alcobaça Municipalities, Portugal. The horizon is recognised as Late Jurassic, Lower Tithonian; “Grés Superiores” Formation according to Marques et al. 1992).

DESCRIPTION
This large left tibia (fig. 1) is nearly complete, only the cnemial crest is lacking. The tibia is
quite robust (high minimal diaphyseal circumference and the minimal diaphyseal diameter) for its length.
The shaft has a slightly concave curve in medial view. The proximal epiphysis shows a broken cnemial crest. It is nearly round in proximal view and somewhat compressed lateromedially and anteroposteriorly expanded. In the proximal epiphysis surface, the medial edge is above the fibular condyle at the lateral side of the epiphysis.
The fibular condyle is convex and well developed. It is well defined at its posterior side; there is a groove between the fibular condyle and the internal condyle. The anterior side of the fibular condyle progressively grades into the cnemial crest not bearing an anterior projection. The cnemial crest is not complete, but apparently, was not very developed. The long fibular crest is placed at the proximal half of the diaphysis and in an anterolateral position. The distal epiphysis is quite expanded lateromedially. The anterior side of the distal epiphysis bears the articular surface for the fibula, astragalus, and calcaneum with a ridge marking the proximomedial contact with the astragalus.
This tibia is quite robust and the Tibial Ratio (Minimal Circumference / Length) is quite
high (47.0) being the highest ratio described in literature.

Measurements of the tibia:
Maximum length: 820 mm; Minimal circumference: 385 mm; Minimal diaphyseal diameter: 106
mm; Maximum distal width: 279 mm; Tibial ratio: 47.0; Fibular crest length: 155.

COMPARISONS AND TAXONOMIC DISCUSSION
The tibia ML 430 is part of a Tetanurae dinosaur because:
• the distal end of tibia is transversely expanded (Sereno, 1997: 456) and is “backing calcaneum” (Sereno et al., 1994: 266; Sereno et al., 1996: Character 14).
• the astragalus is not preserved but it is possible to determine by the tibial contact with the astragalus, that the ascending process of the astragalus was moderately high. Following Gauthier (1986: 25) and Sereno (1997: 456) the high ascending process on the astragalus is synapomorphic of Tetanurae. 

The presence of fibular crest is not synapomorphic of Tetanurae (contra Holtz, 1994:
Character 100) due to its common presence in Ceratosauria. However, its distal position is only present in Tetanurae. ML430 is clearly a basal Tetanurae.
The anterior side of the fibular condyle is continuous with the cnemial crest not bearing a
cranial projection as in Allosaurus and in the tyrannosaurids (Molnar et al., 1990: 197).
Comparing the ML 430 tibia with Torvosaurus tibial insertions of the astragalus we see that it should have a similar shape to the astragalus of Torvosaurus (see Britt, 1991: fig. 23) and “allosauroid type” described in Welles & Long (1974: 197). However, note that Sinraptor (Currie & Zhao, 1993: fig.23) has quite low dorsal process. Therefore, this feature could be dubious in the theropod classification and therefore should be used with some precaution. Nevertheless, it is possible to infer by regarding the ML430 tibia that the feature “ascending process of astragalus enlarged both in height and width to cover most of anterodistal quarter of tibia”, which is synapomorphic of Coelurosauria (Gauthier, 1986: Character 65) is not present. Therefore, this tibia is not a Coelurosauria. A high tibial ratio is more common in carnosaurs (sensu Gauthier) and other big theropods.
One of the diagnostic features of Torvosaurus tanneri is the “tibial circumference to length index = 47” (Britt, 1991:11). Until now, T. tanneri tibia had the highest tibia ratio value (45.1) among theropods described in the literature. This ratio in the Portuguese tibia ML430 is exactly 47, confirming the similarity with Torvosaurus. Therefore ML430 tibia is here provisory regarded as a basal tetanuran related to Torvosaurus tanneri of Morrison Formation while new material is not described.
The ascription of ML430 tibia to Torvosaurus sp. is coherent with the biochronology of that
genus which was previously known from Kimmeridgian-Tithonian beds (Kowallis et al., 1998) of Morrison Formation