Beckwith, Laura, Jácome Cunha, João Paulo Fernandes, and João Saraiva. "
An Empirical Study on End-users Productivity Using Model-based Spreadsheets."
Proceedings of the European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group. Eds. Simon Thorne, and Grenville Croll. EuSpRIG '11. 2011. 87-100.
AbstractSpreadsheets are widely used, and studies have shown that most end-user spreadsheets contain non-trivial errors. To improve end-users productivity, recent research proposes the use of a model-driven engineering approach to spreadsheets. In this paper we conduct the first systematic empirical study to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of this approach. A set of spreadsheet end users worked with two different model-based spreadsheets, and we present and analyze here the results achieved.
Pessanha, Vasco, Ricardo J. Dias, João M. Lourenço, Eitan Farchi, and Diogo Sousa. "
Practical verification of high-level dataraces in transactional memory programs."
Proceedings of 9th the Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Systems: Testing, Analysis, and Debugging. PADTAD'11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011. 26-34.
AbstractIn this paper we present MoTh, a tool that uses static analysis to enable the automatic verification of concurrency anomalies in Transactional Memory Java programs. Currently MoTh detects high-level dataraces and stale-value errors, but it is extendable by plugging-in sensors, each sensor implementing an anomaly detecting algorithm. We validate and benchmark MoTh by applying it to a set of well known concurrent buggy programs and by close comparison of the results with other similar tools. The results achieved so far are very promising, yielding good accuracy while triggering only a very limited number of false warnings.
Borges, J. P., M. H. Godinho, J. L. Figueirinhas, M. N. de Pinho, and M. N. Belgacem. "
All-Cellulosic Based Composites."
Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites. Springer, 2011. 399-421.
Abstractn/a
Duarte, Susana, {Maria Rosário Meireles Ferreira} do de Cabrita, and {Virgílio António Cruz} Machado. "
Exploring Lean and Green Supply Chain Performance Using Balanced Scorecard Perspective."
Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM). IEOM Research Solutions Pty Ltd, 2011. 520-525.
AbstractGoing lean/green is a trend more manufacturers are beginning to recognize as important in an era of economic aus-terity and environmental responsibility. Unlike lean supply chain, which focuses on ways to improve operations and cut wastes from the customer's perspective, green initiatives look at ways to eliminate waste from the environment's perspective. Looking at operations from a ‘lean/green' perspective has benefits to not only the environment, but to manufacturers and customers as well. Based on the literature review we developed a conceptual model incorporating lean and green supply chain into a performance measurement system, using the balanced scorecard approach.
Moniz, António Brandão From the Lisbon strategy to EU2020: illusion or progress for european economies?. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET-Research on Enterprise and Work Innovation, Faculty of Science and Technology, 2011.
AbstractThe majority of papers published in the last decades on European Union policy strongly stress the importance of the so-called Lisbon Strategy approved in the year 2000. The same applies to studies and reports on the shift of the European countries towards modernisation and restructuring policy in recent years. This EU development strategy defines a new direction for the coordination of national policies. But why has it become so important? One of the reasons is the fact that many of the papers are based on the concept of “knowledge society” as the key driver for an increased competitiveness of all political and economic regions of Europe. In this context, the term “knowledge” means the inter-linkage of education (including training, qualification, skills) and innovation (including research, information and communication). The use of the concept represents an important shift in the European strategy: further development would not only be based on investment in material infrastructures, but also more on the immaterial ground. However, this Lisbon Strategy was criticised by many politicians and opinion-makers in the first years of this century because the European structures were not prepared for such a quick change. At the same time, the focus for investment moved away from the traditional support of industrial sectors (manufacturing, agriculture and fisheries, construction) towards the “new economy” sectors. The vision of a knowledge society remained appealing also in a changing international context: the Middle East wars (Afghanistan, Iraq and Israel-Palestine) and the fast growth of the Chinese economy. However, the shadows of new recessions have strongly questioned the options made by the European Council. New challenges have emerged with the need to redefine collective strategies in terms of European development as set by the Lisbon strategy. “Europe 2020” is one more attempt to define a new strategy. But at present no clear path has been identifi