Publications

Export 2 results:
Sort by: [ Author  (Desc)] Title Type Year
A B C D E [F] G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
A
Azevedo, A., J. Firmo, J. Correia, C. Chastre, H. Biscaia, and N. Franco. "Fire behaviour of rc slab strips strengthened with advanced cfrp strengthening systems." fib Symposium. Vol. 2021-June. 2021. 1306-1315. Abstract

Carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite systems are widely used to strengthen reinforced concrete (RC) structures through bonding strips/sheets on the concrete surface – externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) technique, or through strips/rods bonded inside slits in the concrete cover – near-surface mounted (NSM) technique. Although both techniques provide high strength increases, it is usually not possible to use the CFRPs’ full strength due to premature debonding, especially with EBR. This limitation can be overcome when using CREatE (continuous reinforcement embedded at ends) technique (developed by the last three authors), which consists of (i) bonding the central part of the CFRP strip (as in EBR), or the CFRP rod (as in NSM), and (ii) anchoring both ends of the strip/rod inside the concrete section, after a transition curve, enhancing its anchorage capacity. However, all these techniques are susceptible to fire, due to the polymeric nature of CFRP materials and epoxy adhesives. This paper presents the results of an experimental study regarding the fire behaviour of RC slab strips strengthened with EBR, NSM and CREatE techniques, in which the influence of applying different fire protection systems was investigated. The specimens were strengthened with those systems and simultaneously subjected to a service load and the ISO 834 fire curve. The following main results were obtained: (i) without fire protection, the CREatE technique presented the highest fire resistance due to the better anchorage of the CFRP; (ii) when protected, the NSM technique presented higher fire resistance compared to EBR and CREatE techniques; and (iii) “critical” temperatures were proposed for each technique, 1.0Tg, 2.5Tg, and 3.0Tg for EBR, NSM and CREatE techniques, respectively. © Fédération Internationale du Béton (fib) – International Federation for Structural Concrete.

Azevedo, A. S., J. P. Firmo, J. R. Correia, C. Chastre, H. Biscaia, and N. Franco. "Fire behaviour of CFRP-strengthened RC slabs using different techniques – EBR, NSM and CREatE." Composites Part B: Engineering. 230 (2022). AbstractWebsite

This paper presents an experimental study about the fire behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs strengthened with carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips, applied according to three different techniques: externally bonded reinforcement (EBR); near-surface mounted (NSM), and continuous reinforcement embedded at the ends (CREatE), a new technique that prevents premature CFRP debonding. The main goals of this study were three-fold: to understand and compare the fire behaviour of the strengthening techniques, namely the CREatE technique (yet to be studied); to assess the efficiency of the fire protection schemes (constant thickness vs. increased thickness at the CFRP anchorage zones) in extending the fire resistance of the CFRP systems; and, based on the experimental results and data available in the literature, to propose “critical” temperatures for the fire design of CFRP-strengthened RC members. The results obtained show that: (i) without protection, the CREatE technique presented higher fire resistance than the alternative NSM and EBR techniques (24 min vs. 16 min and 2 min); (ii) with fire protection, regardless of its geometry, the NSM and CREatE techniques presented a similar fire resistance (both above 120 min), higher than the EBR technique (less than 60 min); and (iii) the “critical” temperatures for each technique were defined as 1.0Tg, 2.5Tg and 3.0Tg for EBR, NSM and CREatE, respectively, with Tg being the glass transition temperature of the adhesive, defined based on the onset of the storage modulus curve decay from dynamic mechanical analysis. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd