<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlovich, Alexei Yu.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mascarenhas, Helena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Santos, Pedro A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erratum to: Finite section method for a Banach algebra of convolution type operators on Lp(R) with symbols generated by PC and SO (vol 37, pg 559, 2010)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Integral Equations and Operator Theory</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{MAR}</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.springerlink.com/content/eu647210k2w95252/</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{3}</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{BIRKHAUSER VERLAG AG}</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{VIADUKSTRASSE 40-44, PO BOX 133, CH-4010 BASEL, SWITZERLAND}</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">69</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">447-449</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;script src='https://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML'&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;p&gt;We correct Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.3 from [KMS]. This correction ammounts to the observation that the proof of the main result in [KMS] contains a gap in Lemma~10.6 for \(p\ne 2\). The results of [KMS] are true for \(p=2\). &lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">{Correction}</style></work-type></record></records></xml>