@article {Wed_Jul__8_11:09:18_WEST_200,
	title = {Comparison Between Two SMA Constitutive Models for Seismic Applications},
	journal = {Journal of Vibration and Control},
	volume = {16},
	number = {6},
	year = {2010},
	note = {<p>n/a</p>
},
	month = {April},
	pages = {897-914},
	abstract = {<p>This paper analyses and compares the dynamic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) systems based on two different constitutive models. The first model, although being able to describe the response of the material to complex uniaxial loading histories, is temperature and rate independent. Thesecond model couples the mechanical and kinetic laws of the material with a balance equation considering the thermal effects. After numerical validation and calibration, the behavior of these two models is tested in single degree of freedom dynamic systems, with SMAs acting as restoring elements. Different dynamic loads are considered, including artificially generated seismic actions, in a numerical model of a railway viaduct. Finally, it is shown that, in spite of its simplicity, the temperature- and rate-independent modelproduces a set of very satisfying results. This, together with its robustness and straightforward computational implementation, yields a very appealing numerical tool to simulate superelastic passive control applications.</p>
},
	keywords = {constitutive models, passive vibration control, seismic applications, Shape memory alloys},
	url = {http://jvc.sagepub.com/content/16/6/by/author},
	author = {F. P. Amarante dos Santos and C. Cismasiu}
}
